Daniil MedvedevRUSVS
Francisco CerundoloARGhard Elo: Daniil Medvedev 1936, Francisco Cerundolo 1825. 112 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Daniil Medvedev vs Francisco Cerundolo match analysis →DAILY ATP & CHALLENGER RESEARCH · SUNDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2026
Today's tennis matchups
An independent daily overview of 17 matches: surface ratings, rankings, form indicators, conditions and the statistical challenges that could shape each contest. This editorial page does not publish or imply CourtValue Official Picks.
17matches analysed
Beijing ATPCHINA · HARDHARD4matches
Daniil MedvedevRUSVSFrancisco CerundoloARG
Alexander ZverevGERVS
Novak DjokovicSRBhard Elo: Alexander Zverev 2050, Novak Djokovic 1997. 53 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Alexander Zverev vs Novak Djokovic match analysis →
Alex De MinaurAUSVS
Andrey RublevRUShard Elo: Alex De Minaur 1927, Andrey Rublev 1836. 92 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Alex De Minaur vs Andrey Rublev match analysis →
Hubert HurkaczPOLVS
Karen KhachanovRUShard Elo: Hubert Hurkacz 1801, Karen Khachanov 1792. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.
Hubert Hurkacz vs Karen Khachanov match analysis →Tokyo ATPJAPAN · HARDHARD4matches
Carlos AlcarazESPVS
Denis ShapovalovCANhard Elo: Carlos Alcaraz 2080, Denis Shapovalov 1798. 282 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Carlos Alcaraz vs Denis Shapovalov match analysis →
Valentin VacherotMONVS
Arthur FilsFRAhard Elo: Valentin Vacherot 1788, Arthur Fils 1974. 186 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Valentin Vacherot vs Arthur Fils match analysis →
Jiri LeheckaCZEVSADAdolfo Daniel VallejoPARhard Elo: Jiri Lehecka 1903, Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 1570. 334 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Jiri Lehecka vs Adolfo Daniel Vallejo match analysis →
Jaume MunarESPVSKJKyrian JacquetFRAhard Elo: Jaume Munar 1748, Kyrian Jacquet 1674. 74 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Jaume Munar vs Kyrian Jacquet match analysis →Bari ChallengerITALY · CLAYCLAY1match
JCJuan Cruz Martin ManzanoITAVSSPSamuele PieriITA
clay Elo: Juan Cruz Martin Manzano 1357, Samuele Pieri 1265. 92 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano vs Samuele Pieri match analysis →Columbus ChallengerUSA · HARDHARD1match
Dylan DietrichSUIVSASAbedallah ShelbayhJORhard Elo: Dylan Dietrich 1509, Abedallah Shelbayh 1479. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.
Dylan Dietrich vs Abedallah Shelbayh match analysis →Curitiba ChallengerBRAZIL · CLAYCLAY1match
GHGustavo HeideBRAVSGIGuido Ivan JustoARG
clay Elo: Gustavo Heide 1606, Guido Ivan Justo 1437. 169 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Gustavo Heide vs Guido Ivan Justo match analysis →Jingshan ChallengerCHINA · HARDHARD1match
Mattia BellucciITAVSLHLloyd HarrisRSAhard Elo: Mattia Bellucci 1666, Lloyd Harris 1709. 43 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Mattia Bellucci vs Lloyd Harris match analysis →Mouilleron-Le-Captif ChallengerFRANCE · HARDHARD1match
SGSascha Gueymard WayenburgFRAVS
Clement ChidekhFRA
Clement ChidekhFRAhard Elo: Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 1521, Clement Chidekh 1552. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Clement Chidekh match analysis →Porto ChallengerPORTUGAL · HARDHARD1match
HRHenrique RochaPORVSIMInaki Montes De La TorreESP
hard Elo: Henrique Rocha 1570, Inaki Montes De La Torre 1521. 49 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Henrique Rocha vs Inaki Montes De La Torre match analysis →Villena Challenger QualifyingSPAIN · HARDHARD3matches
MEMathys ErhardFRAVS
Oliver TarvetGBR
Oliver TarvetGBRhard Elo: Mathys Erhard 1399, Oliver Tarvet 1605. 206 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Mathys Erhard vs Oliver Tarvet match analysis →NVNiels ViskerNEDVSMTMarko TopoGER
hard Elo: Niels Visker 1352, Marko Topo 1465. 114 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Niels Visker vs Marko Topo match analysis →
Diego Dedura PalomeroGERVSVUVadym UrsuUKRhard Elo: Diego Dedura Palomero 1351, Vadym Ursu 1217. 134 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Diego Dedura Palomero vs Vadym Ursu match analysis →