Today's tennis matchups

RBRemy BertolaSUIVSDenis ShapovalovCAN

hard Elo: Remy Bertola 1450, Denis Shapovalov 1808. 359 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Taylor FritzUSAVSRinky HijikataAUS

hard Elo: Taylor Fritz 1868, Rinky Hijikata 1672. 196 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Hubert HurkaczPOLVSZizou BergsBEL

hard Elo: Hubert Hurkacz 1842, Zizou Bergs 1759. 83 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Jerome KymSUIVSArthur RinderknechFRA

hard Elo: Jerome Kym 1632, Arthur Rinderknech 1734. 101 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Hubert HurkaczPOLVSArthur FilsFRA

hard Elo: Hubert Hurkacz 1842, Arthur Fils 1947. 105 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Yannick HanfmannGERVSJan Lennard StruffGER

hard Elo: Yannick Hanfmann 1711, Jan Lennard Struff 1700. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Dominic StrickerSUIVSCasper RuudNOR

hard Elo: Dominic Stricker 1550, Casper Ruud 1875. 324 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Ben SheltonUSAVSAleksandar KovacevicUSA

hard Elo: Ben Shelton 1944, Aleksandar Kovacevic 1614. 331 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Daniel AltmaierGERVSJuan Manuel CerundoloARG

hard Elo: Daniel Altmaier 1651, Juan Manuel Cerundolo 1674. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Alex MichelsenUSAVSBotic Van De ZandschulpNED

hard Elo: Alex Michelsen 1838, Botic Van De Zandschulp 1790. 48 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Alejandro Davidovich FokinaESPVSZizou BergsBEL

hard Elo: Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 1930, Zizou Bergs 1759. 172 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Valentin VacherotMONVSMariano NavoneARG

hard Elo: Valentin Vacherot 1809, Mariano Navone 1714. 95 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

MBMika BrunoldSUIVSNuno BorgesPOR

hard Elo: Mika Brunold 1606, Nuno Borges 1766. 160 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardFRAVSArthur FilsFRA

hard Elo: Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 1549, Arthur Fils 1947. 398 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Taylor FritzUSAVSStefanos TsitsipasGRE

hard Elo: Taylor Fritz 1868, Stefanos Tsitsipas 1851. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Alejandro TabiloCHIVSRafael JodarESP

hard Elo: Alejandro Tabilo 1745, Rafael Jodar 1948. 204 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Novak DjokovicSRBVSUgo HumbertFRA

hard Elo: Novak Djokovic 2015, Ugo Humbert 1783. 233 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

SWStan WawrinkaSUIVSJiri LeheckaCZE

hard Elo: Stan Wawrinka 1640, Jiri Lehecka 1910. 270 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Arthur FeryGBRVSJacob FearnleyGBR

hard Elo: Arthur Fery 1704, Jacob Fearnley 1673. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Alexander ZverevGERVSMLMartin LandaluceESP

hard Elo: Alexander Zverev 2048, Martin Landaluce 1575. 473 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Luca Van AsscheFRAVSLearner TienUSA

hard Elo: Luca Van Assche 1724, Learner Tien 1874. 150 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

AMAdrian MannarinoFRAVSIgnacio BusePER

hard Elo: Adrian Mannarino 1673, Ignacio Buse 1691. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Matteo BerrettiniITAVSTomas Martin EtcheverryARG

hard Elo: Matteo Berrettini 1763, Tomas Martin Etcheverry 1684. 79 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Cameron NorrieGBRVSFrancisco CerundoloARG

hard Elo: Cameron Norrie 1766, Francisco Cerundolo 1838. 72 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Lorenzo MusettiITAVSFrances TiafoeUSA

hard Elo: Lorenzo Musetti 1837, Frances Tiafoe 1902. 64 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Tomas MachacCZEVSAlex De MinaurAUS

hard Elo: Tomas Machac 1746, Alex De Minaur 1946. 201 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Daniel Merida AguilarESPVSDaniil MedvedevRUS

hard Elo: Daniel Merida Aguilar 1806, Daniil Medvedev 1969. 164 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Flavio CobolliITAVSGrigor DimitrovBUL

hard Elo: Flavio Cobolli 1802, Grigor Dimitrov 1710. 92 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Luciano DarderiITAVSMatteo ArnaldiITA

hard Elo: Luciano Darderi 1704, Matteo Arnaldi 1676. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Jakub MensikCZEVSLukas NeumayerAUT

hard Elo: Jakub Mensik 1863, Lukas Neumayer 1467. 396 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Tommy PaulUSAVSAndrey RublevRUS

hard Elo: Tommy Paul 1886, Andrey Rublev 1816. 70 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Karen KhachanovRUSVSCarlos AlcarazESP

hard Elo: Karen Khachanov 1816, Carlos Alcaraz 2086. 270 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Jurij RodionovAUTVSNikoloz BasilashviliGEO

hard Elo: Jurij Rodionov 1586, Nikoloz Basilashvili 1667. 81 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Vit KoprivaCZEVSLukas NeumayerAUT

hard Elo: Vit Kopriva 1609, Lukas Neumayer 1467. 142 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Moez Echargui 1456, Benjamin Hassan 1405. 51 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Ugo BlanchetFRAVSVUVadym UrsuUKR

hard Elo: Ugo Blanchet 1482, Vadym Ursu 1217. 265 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Kilian FeldbauschSUIVSTPTom ParisFRA

hard Elo: Kilian Feldbausch 1369, Tom Paris 1338. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Michael Geerts 1331, Niels Mcdonald 1238. 92 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Lucas Poullain 1485, Matisse Bobichon 1467. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

MRMichele RibecaiITAVSNicolai Budkov KjaerNOR

hard Elo: Michele Ribecai 1424, Nicolai Budkov Kjaer 1560. 136 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Matisse Bobichon 1467, Michael Geerts 1331. 136 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Martin Damm 1636, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 1563. 73 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Zsombor Piros 1661, Laslo Djere 1636. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Matteo Martineau 1432, Otto Virtanen 1589. 157 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Tom Paris 1338, Borna Gojo 1619. 281 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Stefano TravagliaITAVSPHPierre Hugues HerbertFRA

hard Elo: Stefano Travaglia 1507, Pierre Hugues Herbert 1568. 61 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

GDGabriel DialloCANVSNishesh BasavareddyUSA

hard Elo: Gabriel Diallo 1658, Nishesh Basavareddy 1675. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Hugo Gaston 1636, Daniil Glinka 1547. 89 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

FBFelix BalshawFRAVSUgo BlanchetFRA

hard Elo: Felix Balshaw 1577, Ugo Blanchet 1482. 95 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Hugo GrenierFRAVSMKMoise KouameFRA

hard Elo: Hugo Grenier 1469, Moise Kouame 1476. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

IMInaki Montes De La TorreESPVSToby SamuelGBR

hard Elo: Inaki Montes De La Torre 1574, Toby Samuel 1704. 131 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Clement TaburFRAVSFRFilippo RomanoITA

hard Elo: Clement Tabur 1542, Filippo Romano 1472. 70 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Moez Echargui 1456, Francesco Maestrelli 1453. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Shintaro MochizukiJPNVSFederico CinaITA

hard Elo: Shintaro Mochizuki 1507, Federico Cina 1575. 68 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Gonzalo BuenoPERVSABAlex BarrenaARG

clay Elo: Gonzalo Bueno 1469, Alex Barrena 1486. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

clay Elo: Nick Hardt 1403, Juan Manuel La Serna 1517. 113 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

GVGonzalo VillanuevaARGVSLautaro MidonARG

clay Elo: Gonzalo Villanueva 1340, Lautaro Midon 1543. 203 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Camilo Ugo CarabelliARGVSFCFederico CoriaARG

clay Elo: Camilo Ugo Carabelli 1696, Federico Coria 1457. 239 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

JPJuan Pablo VarillasPERVSRodrigo Pacheco MendezMEX

clay Elo: Juan Pablo Varillas 1506, Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 1436. 70 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

PBPedro Boscardin DiasBRAVSJuan Carlos Prado AngeloBOL

clay Elo: Pedro Boscardin Dias 1427, Juan Carlos Prado Angelo 1519. 92 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Tomas Barrios VeraCHIVSJEJuan EstevezARG

clay Elo: Tomas Barrios Vera 1525, Juan Estevez 1200. 325 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

clay Elo: Franco Roncadelli 1427, Valerio Aboian 1444. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Nicolas JarryCHIVSHugo DellienBOL

clay Elo: Nicolas Jarry 1634, Hugo Dellien 1601. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Diego Dedura PalomeroGERVSGAGenaro Alberto OlivieriARG

clay Elo: Diego Dedura Palomero 1517, Genaro Alberto Olivieri 1440. 77 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Daniel Elahi GalanCOLVSLJLorenzo Joaquin RodriguezARG

clay Elo: Daniel Elahi Galan 1446, Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez 1172. 274 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Filip MisolicAUTVSJAJuan Alejandro Hernandez SerranoMEX

clay Elo: Filip Misolic 1634, Juan Alejandro Hernandez Serrano 1210. 424 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

clay Elo: Alan Magadan 1356, Tristan Mccormick 1125. 232 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Jake Delaney 1142, Alexandr Binda 1283. 141 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Tristan Schoolkate 1572, Masamichi Imamura 1232. 340 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

SFSergey FominUZBVSLiam BroadyGBR

hard Elo: Sergey Fomin 1256, Liam Broady 1465. 209 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Charles Broom 1465, Akira Santillan 1362. 103 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: James Mccabe 1413, Hiroki Moriya 1302. 111 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Fajing Sun 1424, Hayato Matsuoka 1406. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Ognjen Milic 1380, Kaichi Uchida 1257. 123 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Petr Bar Biryukov 1371, Semen Pankin 1259. 111 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Yu Hsiou HsuTPEVSKSKeegan SmithUSA

hard Elo: Yu Hsiou Hsu 1398, Keegan Smith 1422. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Naoya Honda 1236, Filip Peliwo 1237. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

Elias YmerSWEVSYZYi ZhouCHN

hard Elo: Elias Ymer 1456, Yi Zhou 1506. 50 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Mili Poljicak 1325, Yuta Shimizu 1390. 65 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Luca Castelnuovo 1224, Filip Peliwo 1237. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

August HolmgrenDENVSJay Dylan Hara FriendJPN

hard Elo: August Holmgren 1451, Jay Dylan Hara Friend 1560. 109 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Marin CilicCROVSZhizhen ZhangCHN

hard Elo: Marin Cilic 1729, Zhizhen Zhang 1546. 183 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Stefanos SakellaridisGREVSTimofey SkatovKAZ

hard Elo: Stefanos Sakellaridis 1577, Timofey Skatov 1476. 100 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Terence AtmaneFRAVSSoon Woo KwonKOR

hard Elo: Terence Atmane 1705, Soon Woo Kwon 1694. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

LHLloyd HarrisRSAVSJuncheng ShangCHN

hard Elo: Lloyd Harris 1702, Juncheng Shang 1657. 46 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Terence AtmaneFRAVSKMKoki MatsudaJPN

hard Elo: Terence Atmane 1705, Koki Matsuda 1180. 525 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Christian Langmo 1229, Aleksandar Vukic 1598. 369 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Rei SakamotoJPNVSKSKasidit SamrejTHA

hard Elo: Rei Sakamoto 1687, Kasidit Samrej 1402. 285 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

BZBeibit ZhukayevKAZVSColeman WongHKG

hard Elo: Beibit Zhukayev 1356, Coleman Wong 1686. 330 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Sho ShimabukuroJPNVSJKJan KumstatCZE

hard Elo: Sho Shimabukuro 1562, Jan Kumstat 1490. 72 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

OJOmar JasikaAUSVSAlexandre MullerFRA

hard Elo: Omar Jasika 1313, Alexandre Muller 1617. 303 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Taro DanielJPNVSAIAndre IlaganUSA

hard Elo: Taro Daniel 1511, Andre Ilagan 1497. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Koki Matsuda 1180, Beibit Zhukayev 1356. 176 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Alexis GalarneauCANVSMRMees RottgeringNED

hard Elo: Alexis Galarneau 1531, Mees Rottgering 1563. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Mitchell Krueger 1440, Andres Andrade 1548. 109 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

Dylan DietrichSUIVSColton SmithUSA

hard Elo: Dylan Dietrich 1656, Colton Smith 1470. 187 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

TLTimo LegoutFRAVSValentin RoyerFRA

hard Elo: Timo Legout 1523, Valentin Royer 1581. 58 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: J J Wolf 1551, Abedallah Shelbayh 1518. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

AMAidan MayoUSAVSHynek BartonCZE

hard Elo: Aidan Mayo 1436, Hynek Barton 1489. 54 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Sebastian Gorzny 1425, Darwin Blanch 1577. 151 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Liam Draxl 1568, Tomasz Berkieta 1225. 343 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

BSBraden ShickUSAVSMax Hans RehbergGER

hard Elo: Braden Shick 1428, Max Hans Rehberg 1460. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.

hard Elo: Stefan Kozlov 1372, Murphy Cassone 1467. 95 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

DMDaniel MilavskyUSAVSHarry WendelkenGBR

hard Elo: Daniel Milavsky 1406, Harry Wendelken 1512. 106 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Spencer Johnson 1434, Tomasz Berkieta 1225. 208 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Timo Legout 1523, Andrew Fenty 1249. 274 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.

hard Elo: Karl Poling 1268, Patrick Zahraj 1267. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.