Francisco CerundoloARGVS
Jakub MensikCZEhard Elo: Francisco Cerundolo 1825, Jakub Mensik 1860. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.
Francisco Cerundolo vs Jakub Mensik match analysis →DAILY ATP & CHALLENGER RESEARCH · SATURDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2026
Today's tennis matchups
An independent daily overview of 20 matches: surface ratings, rankings, form indicators, conditions and the statistical challenges that could shape each contest. This editorial page does not publish or imply CourtValue Official Picks.
20matches analysed
Beijing ATPCHINA · HARDHARD5matches
Francisco CerundoloARGVSJakub MensikCZE
Daniil MedvedevRUSVS
Jan Lennard StruffGERhard Elo: Daniil Medvedev 1936, Jan Lennard Struff 1654. 282 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Daniil Medvedev vs Jan Lennard Struff match analysis →
Alex De MinaurAUSVS
Quentin HalysFRAhard Elo: Alex De Minaur 1927, Quentin Halys 1709. 218 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Alex De Minaur vs Quentin Halys match analysis →
Andrey RublevRUSVS
Roman SafiullinRUShard Elo: Andrey Rublev 1836, Roman Safiullin 1736. 100 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Andrey Rublev vs Roman Safiullin match analysis →
Alexander ZverevGERVS
Juncheng ShangCHNhard Elo: Alexander Zverev 2050, Juncheng Shang 1641. 409 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Alexander Zverev vs Juncheng Shang match analysis →Tokyo ATPJAPAN · HARDHARD4matches
Carlos AlcarazESPVS
Matteo ArnaldiITAhard Elo: Carlos Alcaraz 2080, Matteo Arnaldi 1677. 403 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Carlos Alcaraz vs Matteo Arnaldi match analysis →
Denis ShapovalovCANVS
Alejandro TabiloCHIhard Elo: Denis Shapovalov 1798, Alejandro Tabilo 1753. 45 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Denis Shapovalov vs Alejandro Tabilo match analysis →
Matteo BerrettiniITAVSADAdolfo Daniel VallejoPARhard Elo: Matteo Berrettini 1780, Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 1570. 210 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Matteo Berrettini vs Adolfo Daniel Vallejo match analysis →
Ugo HumbertFRAVS
Jiri LeheckaCZEhard Elo: Ugo Humbert 1802, Jiri Lehecka 1903. 101 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Ugo Humbert vs Jiri Lehecka match analysis →Bari ChallengerITALY · CLAYCLAY1match
Vitaliy SachkoUKRVSSPSamuele PieriITAclay Elo: Vitaliy Sachko 1518, Samuele Pieri 1265. 253 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Vitaliy Sachko vs Samuele Pieri match analysis →Columbus ChallengerUSA · HARDHARD2matches
ASAbedallah ShelbayhJORVSMKMitchell KruegerUSA
hard Elo: Abedallah Shelbayh 1479, Mitchell Krueger 1427. 52 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Abedallah Shelbayh vs Mitchell Krueger match analysis →
Dylan DietrichSUIVSAAAndres AndradeECUhard Elo: Dylan Dietrich 1509, Andres Andrade 1532. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.
Dylan Dietrich vs Andres Andrade match analysis →Curitiba ChallengerBRAZIL · CLAYCLAY2matches
GHGustavo HeideBRAVSPBPedro Boscardin DiasBRA
clay Elo: Gustavo Heide 1606, Pedro Boscardin Dias 1409. 197 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Gustavo Heide vs Pedro Boscardin Dias match analysis →GIGuido Ivan JustoARGVS
Tomas Barrios VeraCHI
Tomas Barrios VeraCHIclay Elo: Guido Ivan Justo 1437, Tomas Barrios Vera 1538. 101 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Guido Ivan Justo vs Tomas Barrios Vera match analysis →Jingshan ChallengerCHINA · HARDHARD2matches
YEYanki ErelTURVS
Mattia BellucciITA
Mattia BellucciITAhard Elo: Yanki Erel 1415, Mattia Bellucci 1666. 251 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Yanki Erel vs Mattia Bellucci match analysis →LHLloyd HarrisRSAVS
Alex BoltAUS
Alex BoltAUShard Elo: Lloyd Harris 1709, Alex Bolt 1516. 194 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Lloyd Harris vs Alex Bolt match analysis →Mouilleron-Le-Captif ChallengerFRANCE · HARDHARD2matches
Clement ChidekhFRAVSHBHenry BernetSUIhard Elo: Clement Chidekh 1552, Henry Bernet 1343. 209 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Clement Chidekh vs Henry Bernet match analysis →
Joel SchwaerzlerAUTVSSGSascha Gueymard WayenburgFRAhard Elo: Joel Schwaerzler 1465, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg 1521. 57 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
Joel Schwaerzler vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg match analysis →Porto ChallengerPORTUGAL · HARDHARD2matches
DJDavid Jorda SanchisESPVSIMInaki Montes De La TorreESP
hard Elo: David Jorda Sanchis 1316, Inaki Montes De La Torre 1521. 205 points separate the players, making surface adaptation a central question.
David Jorda Sanchis vs Inaki Montes De La Torre match analysis →HRHenrique RochaPORVS
Jerome KymSUI
Jerome KymSUIhard Elo: Henrique Rocha 1570, Jerome Kym 1565. The narrow rating gap points to a finely balanced matchup.
Henrique Rocha vs Jerome Kym match analysis →